Assessing the Validity and Reliability of the Arabic Version of the Locomotor Capabilities Index in Adults with Lower Limb Amputation: Cross-cultural Adaptation Study

Authors

  • Eman Alnamankany Rehabilitation Department, Al Noor special hospital, Mecca, Saudi Arabia.
  • Wesam Qurban Occupational Therapy Department, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  • Marwa Eid Department Of Physical Therapy College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62464/ijoprp.v3i10.56

Keywords:

Locomotor Capabilities Index, Timed "Up-and-Go,” EuroQol Instrument', EQ-5D, Validity, Reliability, Internal Consistency, Amputation.

Abstract

Background: Amputations can significantly negatively impact an individual’s economic status, psychological health, and social life. The Locomotor Capabilities Index (LCI) measures how well people with lower-limb amputation can use prostheses to carry out activities.  The validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the LCI were assessed in this study. Methods: The English Locomotor Capabilities Index had been translated forward and backward for cross-cultural adaptation to Arabic (LCI). The subsequent Arabic (SAUDI) LCI was then administered to fifty-seven patients with amputation; thirteen of them were women with a mean age of 53 years (ranging from 29 to 71), while forty-four were men with a mean age of 55 years (ranging between 20 and 85 years). All patients were trained in Al Nour Rehabilitation training centre – in Mecca -KSA. The validity and reliability of the Arabic LCI were evaluated through several measures. In two different subgroups of 20 and 30 amputation patients, the Arabic LCI was compared to the Time Up-and-Go test (TUG) and the Index of EQ-5D Health Utility to assess its structural validity. Scores from various age groups were compared to determine the discrimination value. Thirty individuals with amputations underwent test-retest reliability (7–14 day) evaluations. Results: The Arabic LCI demonstrated good converging structure validity, exhibiting a strong correlation with TUG (r = 0.79 & 95%CI - 0.90- 0.60) and EQ-5D (r= 0.81,95%CI 0.61- 0.92), as well as discriminatory effect, with mean scores for older amputees significantly lower than for younger amputees (p < 0.001)) and high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0.93 ) (CI 95 %  0.91-0.94).  Test-retest reliability for unilateral amputees had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.93 (95 % CI 0.83-0.92). 17.5 % of the cases involved the ceiling effect. The ceiling effect occurred in 17.5% of the cases. Conclusion: The Arabic version of the LCI has shown strong internal consistency and validity in adults with amputation. 

References

Abouammoh, N., Aldebeya, W., & Abuzaid, R. (2021). Experiences and needs of patients with lower limb amputation in Saudi Arabia: A qualitative study. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 27(4), 407–413. https://doi.org/10.26719/emhj.20.124

Aldaihan, M. M. (2023). Cross-cultural adaptation of the Arabic version of the Waterloo Footedness Questionnaire-Revised: WFQ-Ar. medRxiv.

Al Wahbi, A., Aldakhil, S., Al Turki, S., El Kayali, A., Al Kohlani, H., & Al Showmer, A. (2016). Risk factors for amputation in extremity vascular injuries in Saudi Arabia. Vascular Health and Risk Management, 12(2), 229–232. https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S91452

Bäck-Pettersson, S., & Björkelund, C. (2005). Care of elderly lower limb amputees, as described in medical and nursing records. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 19(4).

Ferriero, G., Dughi, D., Orlandini, D., Moscato, T., Nicita, D., & Franchignoni, F. (2005). Measuring long-term outcome in people with lower limb amputation: Cross-validation of the Italian versions of the Prosthetic Profile of the Amputee and Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire. Eura Medicophys, 41(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10160-005-0040-2

Fleury, A. M., Salih, S. A., & Peel, N. M. (2013). Rehabilitation of the older vascular amputee: A review of the literature. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 13(2), 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12016

Franchignoni, F., Orlandini, D., Ferriero, G., & Moscato, T. A. (2004). Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Locomotor Capabilities Index in adults with lower-limb amputation undergoing prosthetic training. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(5), 743–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.010

Gailey, R., Allen, K., Castles, J., Kucharik, J., & Roeder, M. (2008). Review of secondary physical conditions associated with lower-limb amputation and long-term prosthesis use. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 45(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2008.01.0002

Gauthier-Gagnon, C., & Grisé, M. C. (2006). Tools to measure outcomes of people with a lower limb amputation: Update on the PPA and LCI. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, 18(6).

Gauthier-Gagnon, C., Grisé, M. C., & Potvin, D. (1999). Enabling factors related to prosthetic use by people with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80(6), 706–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90177-6

Grisé, M. C. L., Gauthier-Gagnon, C., & Martineau, G. G. (1993). Prosthetic profile of people with lower extremity amputation: Conception and design of a follow-up questionnaire. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74(8), 862–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9993(93)90014-2

Hermodsson, Y., Ekdahl, C., & Persson, B. M. (1998). Outcome after trans-tibial amputation for vascular disease: A follow-up after eight years. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 12(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.1998.tb00479.x

Kahle, J. T., Highsmith, M. J., Schaepper, H., Johannesson, A., Orendurff, M. S., & Kaufman, K. (2016). Predicting walking ability following lower limb amputation: An updated systematic literature review. Technology and Innovation, 18(2–3), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.21300/18.2-3.2016.125

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

Larsson, B., Johannesson, A., Andersson, I. H., & Atroshi, I. (2009). The Locomotor Capabilities Index: Validity and reliability of the Swedish version in adults with lower limb amputation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7(44), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-7-44

McDonald, C. L., Westcott-McCoy, S., Weaver, M. R., Haagsma, J., & Kartin, D. (2020). Global prevalence of traumatic non-fatal limb amputation. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 45(2), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364620972258

Miller, W. C., Deathe, A. B., & Speechley, M. (2001). Lower extremity prosthetic mobility: A comparison of 3 self-report scales. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82(10), 1432–1440. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.33221

Ministry of Health, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (2021). GoR education statistical yearbook - 2021. UAE Statistical Yearbook. Retrieved from https://www.moh.gov.sa/en/Ministry/Statistics/Book/Pages/default.aspx

Pauley, T., Devlin, M., & Heslin, K. (2006). Falls sustained during inpatient rehabilitation after lower limb amputation: Prevalence and predictors. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(6), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000219119.58965.8

Ranker, A., Örgel, M., Schiller, J., Egen, C., Ranker, A. H., Greitemann, B., et al. (2021). Translation, adaptation, reliability, and validity of the German version of the Prosthesis Mobility Questionnaire 20 (PMQ) on patients with major lower limb amputation. Rehabilitation, 60(6), 605–613. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2152-6723

Roșca, A. C., Baciu, C. C., Burtăverde, V., & Mateizer, A. (2021). Psychological consequences in patients with amputation of a limb: An interpretative-phenomenological analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(537493), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.537493

Shankar, P., Grewal, V. S., Agrawal, S., & Nair, S. V. (2020). A study on quality of life among lower limb amputees at a tertiary prosthetic rehabilitation center. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 76(1), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2019.02.008

Tisi, P., & Callam, M. (2002). Type of skin incision for below knee amputation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4(4), CD004981. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004981.pub4

Downloads

Published

2024-11-28

How to Cite

Alnamankany, E., Wesam Qurban, & Eid, M. (2024). Assessing the Validity and Reliability of the Arabic Version of the Locomotor Capabilities Index in Adults with Lower Limb Amputation: Cross-cultural Adaptation Study. International Journal of Physical Therapy Research &Amp; Practice, 3(10), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.62464/ijoprp.v3i10.56

Issue

Section

ARTICLE